The stock curves are simply an average of however many models of a given headphone they sampled to arrive at the average. Measurement method aside, headphones can have pretty wide inconsistencies which is why SW offers the service where they measure your actual headphones. (For example did they use of a dummy head, and Is it the same model? Did they sample more than one pair? etc) And it's unknown whether each company used the same method to measure the frequency response of each headphone model. So you would know in the end which company did a good job and which rather not.Ĭlick to expand.Beat's point is that no two headphones are actually identical, even if by the same manufacturer. You will hear differences relatively quickly. Do now all headphones sound the same afterwards? or at least similar? Which tool accomplishes this task best? Use pink noise for a rough impression. Let all tools equalize the headphones with the corresponding preset.
![sonarworks vs waves nx sonarworks vs waves nx](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DrANI-RwURA/maxresdefault.jpg)
Connect 3 different headphones that also sound quite different without tools (e.g. In my eyes a good test for this kind of plugims would be for example: That's why I simply asked the question about the meaning of the measurement. B) because the products are slightly different in quality one way or the other (Sonar didn't have the same headphones as Waves) C).there are more reasons.
![sonarworks vs waves nx sonarworks vs waves nx](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/c4fBf2JhI4I/maxresdefault.jpg)
This is because the plug-in manufacturers A) hardly ever measured the headphone curves under the same conditions. However, even without measuring, it can be assumed that the results will differ among each other. Once more: You may measure as many curves as you want. TB Morphit : Beyerdynamic DT 990, 200% amount of correction, no limiterĪC-R 128 : Scale button set to "LU MOM" at "0.0" when playing the tone file.
Sonarworks vs waves nx pro#
Sonarworks : Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 250 Ohm Average, Dry/Wet set to 100, output set to 0.0 Waves Nx : Beyerdynamic DT-990 (250 ohm), no head tracker, no room ambiance, set to eq solo playlist?list=PLzFvCAfIq7a2SIBfDhpCytfJ4RHVb_KLY Whoever has some time to waste can now create his own lab and test the flattening of his headphone. This very instructive exercise helped me to configure my DT990. Noise files also reveal their different coloration. Clearly, All Eq plugins have been boosted between range 500Hz-3000Hz. Then, each Eq plugin has been tested with successive tone files dropped onto the audio track. RTings has been used as reference to gather output values vs input amplitude of 90dB.Įach Eq plugin was dropped onto the Master track alongside with AC-R 128 and ReaEq. So I downloaded the demo versions of Waves Nx, Sonarworks and TB Morphit. Recently I wished to understand how some popular Headphones equalizer apply their flattening on my DT990. It's not helping you hear "better." it's technically less accurate as far as raw audio is concerned. I could see an argument to train with NX if you mix through it, but only for the sake of getting used to the artifacts you are introducing.
![sonarworks vs waves nx sonarworks vs waves nx](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/b474e9_beab433f33e445af90149d99ab2ee553~mv2.jpg)
The changes that you are actually training your ears to react to would be relatively identical if this curve is applied throughout the whole course of the exercise.Īlso, I've never used NX but it makes sense that cross-talk and micro-delays would only narrow the stereo image, making it HARDER to do Panman and more confusing to do Delay Polanco Is your loopback function doing a round of DA/AD conversion? I'd look into that if precision monitoring is the goal because it sounds like your subjecting yourself to an immediate compromise of fidelity in order to incorporate these plug-in's for training.
![sonarworks vs waves nx sonarworks vs waves nx](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/w_DjI8hFJ4w/hqdefault.jpg)
You're just hearing a different distribution of them as a starting point. You aren't hearing "clearer frequencies" when you use Sonarworks. The whole point is to detect the CHANGES. This stuff doesn't make a difference in the first place in regards to training.